Do political stickers work? (2020)
karlsnotes.com
karlsnotes.com
As an Irishman driving through some parts of Northern Ireland the best/worst case of that was some small towns and villages that more or less literally, had every available space covered in the British flag. I mean every building and many windows had a flag on or it it, every lamppost was covered in both flags and bunting of even more flags. It looked like there was some sort of British flag bomb that had coated the town.
Do you think me with my Irish reg car, and Irish accent stopped in that town while I was driving through?
1. Putting them up cements the loyalty of the person putting them up. You're less likely to consider switching away from the Purple Party to the Orange Party when you've already spent a lot of time and effort putting up Purple posters and when you've publicly declared your affiliation by plastering your property with Purple stickers.
2. Having a lot of them up demonstrates that your party has enough support to be worth bothering with. Few people like the idea of voting for a likely loser, especially in places where elections are first-past-the-post. So having lots of Purple partisans put up Purple posters lets everyone see that Purple are in with a chance and therefore not feel as if a vote for the Purple candidate would be thrown away.
#1 is a reason why parties should produce these things, though not a reason why individuals should put them up. #2 seems to me a more plausible reason for putting them up than the ones in the article.
If my theory about #2 is right, we might expect to see more political posters in places whose electoral systems make votes for minority parties less valuable. I don't know whether that's actually so.
[For the avoidance of doubt, "Purple" and "Orange" here are arbitrary labels and aren't intended to suggest any actual parties or movements that might use those colours.]
In France the candidate who has the most posters is Asselineau. They are everywhere; but most people know he has no chance of winning the next election.
What a fun little nightmare.
Though who am I to talk, I had a Giant Meteor 2020 yard sign up last cycle....
I've been advocating for a new political party that I call "nuke everything party" and the platform is very simple, launch all the nukes, and party until it all ends.
I assume the hoped for reward is that 'your' candidate wins. I guess the thinking goes that if I am on the fence about who to vote for, but see that a lot of people around me that I feel I have many things in common with openly support candidate A, then I'm more likely to swing towards candidate A myself.
The latter gives a vibe of a person crazy enough that you do not want to mess with them.
Or provoke the attention of a whole squad from the enemy ranks, as it marks you as a high-value object lesson. Whereas a more moderate stance might be common enough for them not to bother going after every such person.
:(And if they did go after you, you'd probably have the sympathy of the public and the authorities more if you were just a moderate follower declaring your allegiance with one flag than if you were a True Believer^TM completely dedicating your property to signaling your status)
I generally have no clue who's car is parked right beside me, nor who put the stickers on their car
For example in local elections in the UK, plenty of people put up a little poster thing for their candidate. I definitely had my attention drawn to candidates I considered no-hopers and gave them a second look. I wouldn't have if I thought they have no support otherwise.
I think this is a bit different to simply repeated advertising. There is also a component of "join us, we're a cool community [of people voting for X], it's OK". Think about, more so in the past, people were often reluctant to admit they are voting for a populist candidate. Stickers can bring such "uncool" candidates into the mainstream.
I am Dutch and in NL, but acquired an 'original' Trump 2016 MAGA shirt ( a friend brought it from the US ).
I am not pro-Trump, but also not anti-Trump, while normal civilized discourse in my town of 'progressives' is Orange man bad. I enjoy the apparent tension the whole subject seems to generate.
I proudly wear the shirt, which is seen as brave by my friends : it could get me in trouble, but I am a big, assertive guy.
The shirt makes people speak up who would have never spoken up given the climate. Some are pro-Trump and some are not anti-Trump, some are US citizens. It definetly brings out the dynamic you are referring to.
Well, there, I said it.
That said, I’ve thought Make America Great Again hats were hilarious since day one. I’ve wanted to get one and wear it, but I know that doing that is taken as a strong sign of endorsement for him and various other things, and it sets some people off into a rage.
Can’t wait until a decade from now when it hopefully settles down and they’re just goofy pieces of vintage wear.
The reactions are pretty hilarious.
The 80s, an American and a Russian are arguing about which country has more freedom.
The American says, “I can walk right up to the White House and shout 'Down with Reagan!' and nothing bad will happen to me.” The Russian replies, “Guess what? I can walk in front of Kremlin and shout 'Down with Reagan!' and nothing will happen to me either.”
Walking around with Bayern Munich/Barcelona/I <3 NY and the like when you are not even close to those cities, just makes you look like a weak person following the currently popular kids.
Wearing US symbols in Europe is outright stupid. You are not part of that group. You are effectively marketing for a competitor of a group you cannot switch. It is beyond me why you would put symbols of the leading military power into pop-culture. Sounds pretty Orwellian to me.
Thanks for sharing.
I guess you have a point here, because you wouldn't call me weak in my face.
To respond to your term from a sibling comment, about arbitrarily join winning teams :
I got and wore the Trump shirt well before his election. Furthermore, what is wrong about being a Barcelona supporter from Germany ( for example ) if you just like and adore their style / spiel ?
Becoming a Barcelona supporter in recent times is definitely joining the winning team. I think there is a difference between recognizing someone’s qualities and actually joining a movement. Just buying a Barca shirt to me is not the same level as actually being a member of a club, watching the home-games live, because that’s where your community is at. It feels more like wearing a Rolling Stones shirt without ever having visited a concert. And that to me just seems like blindly following a popular group.
(I make pointed arguments, obviously there are exceptions to everything.)
On a forum.
And it is indeed not joining a popular group, it is the exact opposite. Because most of the people not wearing the shirt ( AFAIK, I am the only one in town ), are actually in the anti-Trump camp to the point some would like to harass me.
Regarding Barcelona : I know nothing about football or the club, but I think you can call yourself a proper fan for whatever reason you like, follow all their matches online ( think WFH but for sports ) and want to wear the shirt.
I find it odd you paint whole groups of people you don't know as stupid, weak and silly.
Smart people can do stuff that I think of as stupid. It is obvious that everybody can call themselves a fan if they like too. I would ask: If there is no actual commitment to a group, why would you even want to show your participation?
Humans have a lot of partial sub-identities. Few of us are so one-dimensional that they would define themselves through membership in a group. Wearing your national symbols from time to time does not mean that you are a mindless cog in a nationalist machine.
This seems to me a particularly German problem/fear; educated Germans seem to be extra anxious not to be perceived as nationalistic under any circumstances.
The same sentiment exists among intellectuals in other countries, too , but is nowhere near as strong. For example, Poles, Danes or Swiss seem to enjoy their national identity quite a bit more.
Of course, I know the general history that resulted in this situation, but I must ask myself if the pendulum of opinions hasn't swung too far to the other side in Germany.
So a country with a nationalistic government, which is in constant trouble with the EU regarding rule of law, a tiny country with 5 million inhabitants and a country exactly famous for not being part of any groups.
But I do get your point. France would have worked, too.
I think there is a time and a place to feel part of a group, which is not bad in itself. What I do not like is advertising for foreign groups or arbitrarily joining winning teams.
Stickers (logos, yard signs, t-shirts, etc) are:
- expressions of identity, virtue signaling
- source of revenue for the cause
The stuff about marketing, loyalty, branding, and such is all still true. It's just that the underlying core motivators are even more basic, primal, simple.
Source: Ran for office, worked on many campaigns, did fund raising. I'm still flabbergasted. Many contribute $200 and will be very grumpy if they don't get a yard sign. They're paying you to promote you.