How Apple conquered China and learned to think like the Communist Party.
foreignpolicy.com
foreignpolicy.com
I would like to throw in a few counterpoints so we can all maintain a proper context.
1.) When companies become as large as Apple and begin purchasing products from vendors. It is not possible for them to guarantee the safety and operation of every vendor. Just as when you go buy oranges at the grocery store, you might know what country or farm it came from, but you don't know working conditions at that farm. Even if you could know you don't have time to dig through that info - you just want an orange. You, like everyone else, just respond to the major media outrages and exposés and blindly avoid Wal-Mart, etc.
Apple has more leverage here since they are a large company, but when it comes down to it, Apple ordered more screens and the vendor made the bad decision to use n-hexane. All Apple can do is lean on the vendor to make it right and not let it happen again. Believe me, even if Apple hates the workers and secretly wants them to die a horrible death for their stock holders, they don't want this bad press and would have avoided it if they could have.
2.) Outsourcing has real costs. It's not just cheaper because labor is cheaper. When you outsource you have to worry about the government, the infrastructure, shipping, recruiting talent etc. If you paid the Chinese workers American wages, it would not be worth the other costs to outsource at all.
3.) You can't compare living and working conditions between countries. As bad as a 3rd world outsourced job is to us 1st worlder's it's still generally BETTER than what they would have otherwise. In fact Apple and other 'outsourcers' are the one and only reason for the breath-taking trend line that is China's per capita growth: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=china+income+per+capita
Just read about living in China in the 60s. It's horrifying to even think about and makes China today seem like paradise. In short the Chinese are better with Apple than without.
4.) There are not a fixed number of jobs in the world - there are only a fixed number of resources. If China can make us a product cheaper than we can make it WE benefit. Our resources are free to build other things for China when they want to cash in some of those US Dollars they so graciously accepted from Apple in exchange for real goods. Voluntary trade benefits both parties by its very nature or it doesn't happen.
Also, the US unemployment issue is bit off the main topic of an already lengthy comment, but it has much more to do with sticky wages and our past decisions than it does outsourcing.
5.) Finally you can't not outsource. It's impossible. In this age of globalization everything is from everywhere. You can't even build a toaster by yourself: http://www.ted.com/talks/thomas_thwaites_how_i_built_a_toast...
This always seemed like a bullshit argument to me. So it is marginally better to work 16 hour days in terrible conditions while dumping chemicals in local groundwater than it is to starve to death. Well, it turns out that overworking people and polluting is still bad behaviour. These outsourcing companies shouldn't be commended for it. Provide these people good working conditions and a safe environment or don't bother outsourcing.
As an analogy, you wouldn't commend me for purchasing a mail-order bride from a poor country with sex trafficking problems. Yeah, it is marginally better for her than prostitution and she'll have better living conditions, but my behavior is still abusive and exploitative.
Fast-forward to year 2085
> Well, it turns out that asking people to do mechanical work 30 hours a week and dumping CO2 in the atmosphere is still bad behaviour.
They are adults living in a sovereign nation; they are responsible for their own working conditions.
I'm not going to feel white-guilt for stuff that happens in a foreign country over which I have zero control.
Vote with your wallet. If nobody will buy products produced using awful methods, they will no longer be produced that way. It's quite simple. Then you'll say "But everyone else is buying them, so it doesn't matter if I do it too". To which I say "Don't care about what others are doing, just do the right thing yourself".
Also since working conditions are subjective value judgements, I can't even objectively say that someone is working under bad working conditions.
In the first world there are high-rise window cleaners. Some people would consider washing windows a mile in the sky to be cruel and unusual punishment. Others consider it a thrill and would pay to do it.
I am not qualified to determine the difference between a sweatshop and just a highly efficient assembly line. Even if I was qualified, I would not have the necessary information. Even if I had the necessary information, I use too many products for me to examine the supply lines of each one. Even if someone did this for me, they would not be able to probe into the dark depths of communist China.
No, this doesn't fall to me. The working conditions of Chinese people are the responsibility of Chinese people. I will engage in trade with Chinese people and let them decide how they wish to work and how they wish to organize their society.
Ethnic paternalism is so 19th century.
I usually give this link at this point. http://www.slate.com/id/1918/
Krugman discuss, well, why you are a judging hypocr.. cough, a bit harsh. :-)
Edit: Let me put it this way. A millennia ago, my ancestors made today's Afghanistan look like a cosy and peaceful place. Now, it is a bit different -- a welfare state where there haven't been war for a couple of centuries. Both situations are inside the range of human behaviour/nature. The trick is to organise things so society works and so that it gets better over time. So few ways of doing things really works, so it is a bit funny when you complain about just those, from a moral perspective.
I come from a protestant culture; we have problems believing that fun things can be beneficial. :-)
Krugman argued -- many of those things aren't harmful, given the situation the local people are in.
Instead of complaining about something that will be fixed automatically given good governance, work for good governance... Another of my standard links:
http://reason.com/archives/2006/03/01/why-poor-countries-are...
(Me? I am doing good by educating activists about the real problems. :-) )
Also the reason companies outsource isn't to provide the workers with great work environments (that may or may not happen) but to save money.
It's one thing to have occasional issues of the sort. It's a completely different matter to be so bad at preventing these problems that you're ranked dead last amongst international IT companies in China. Apple's famous perfection clearly only applies to things that make it money:
> Ma Jun is one of the leaders of the Green Choice Alliance, a coalition of 36 Chinese NGOs that tracks pollution reports among international brands operating in China. In January, they released a report focusing on global IT companies that ranked Apple dead last among 29 companies in responding to inquiries about pollution and workers' safety. Last winter, Ma met with Jia and helped him pen a letter about working conditions and medical compensation to Apple CEO Steve Jobs. It went unanswered. So did a second letter.
A simple metric: ask the senior management questions that have clear quantified answers. If they, or if anyone reading this that has an outsourced operation, cannot answer that, then outsourcing is being done either badly or astoundingly badly.
Yea, but here's what's scummy: they refuse to even disclose who their suppliers are. Which means that neither journalists nor customers can go out and find out what's going on.
I don't need Apple to spend billions verifying that the children of every last worker are getting their shoes tied in the morning. But I think they should at least give us the chance to look it up ourselves.
Maybe it should be federal law that you should have to report all of your suppliers if you want to sell goods in the US. Maybe report (anonymized) salaries of everyone too, benefits, etc.
If you read this, and agree with it whole heartedly. Please stop, get an education, and learn about how economies grow.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jgdaily/4862908782/
Apple Removes the Dalai Lama From Its Ads in Hong Kong
http://www.nytimes.com/1998/04/17/world/apple-removes-the-da...
Also, why won't you Apple users boycott buying Apple until they take care of the issue in question? Other than being unable to function without the drug you're addicted to?
AirBNB is going to fix a problem which is obviously not caused by them because they are afraid of repercussions. Apple is not afraid of anything, therefore they're going to sit on a pile of gold like a dragon and that's it.
Apple makes and builds high-end products and has the fat margins that goes along with it - instead of outsourcing all manufacturing to China, it could choose to build everything in the US, employ the locals and use that as a selling point. If I pay premium dollar for quality and durability, I would rather that support local manufacturing and local economies, than have that sitting in Apple's vaults. In the end, this is not unlike the the local food movement - people would rather pay extra and support local farmers and economies.
Now combine that with this article and people like Mike Daisey's views that Apple is somehow uniquely responsible to blame for the plight of blue collar workers in China.
Apparently Apple is the cause of all pain in the world. Sheesh I thought they just sold electronics.
Why do you assume Americans are more deserving of Apple's manufacturing jobs than the Chinese?
> If I pay premium dollar for quality and durability, I would rather that support local manufacturing and local economies, than have that sitting in Apple's vaults.
Unfortunately, the Chinese also pay premium dollar and would also rather support local manufacturing and local economies. As China is deemed to become Apple's largest market, it makes sense for Apple to support the Chinese economy rather than the US one.[1]
[1] http://blogs.computerworld.com/18517/apple_crazy_china_will_...
Because the consumers of every nation on earth, deep-down, are superficially patriotic. We don't want to recognize that the global economy is post-nation state. We want to pretend that when we buy an American company's products it is, American. Just as if we decide to buy an Italian sports car we want it to be Italian. Companies prey on these emotional ties to our identities in all manner of ways. In the parent thread's example, Apple does that by labeling their products' packaging, "Designed by Apple in California."
I don't necessarily blame companies for these emotional ties. There was a time when those ties really meant something.
There are great benefits to the US market and many, such as Apple, have taken advantage of it. They also take advantage of the system and keep their money overseas so it won't get taxed.
But when I really look at it, I don't feel connected to any country as much as to history and the ideals of Silicon Valley.
So to me it seems to weird to hold the place I was born as anything special.
OSHA and the associated regulations legislated us right out of the market.
Wait, you think this is bad?
Do you really think America can only compete on being the lowest cost manufacturer?
And the scenario shows, the iPhone could be manufactured in the US and still be profitable (50% margin).
But what ends up happening then is that Singapore for example actively works to import entrepreneurs because their best and brightest went into government.
Finally, there aren't a finite number of businesses; those who think the EPA's regulations are reasonable should have no problem starting a US business to demonstrate the point.
counter-point first: I've heard good things about Sears stuff, but it's not available here
I've never considered American manufacturing to be high quality or premium. My experience is mostly based on American cars - which tend to have appalling build quality and reliability - and a few "made in America" bits I have, all of which are pretty average.
I tend to associate American manufacturing with things like welding huge bits of iron together. durability? sure. attention to detail and care? not so much
Most of the American bits never really leave the US because logistics cost the same everywhere. A big heavy washing machine from china loses its cost advantage once shipping and duties are added to the price. A high-end laptop has most of the price in labor and parts. Shipping costs next to nothing for it.
American cars haven't really impressed me. For a while I also questionned the quality; why settle for something with a 3 year warranty when the japanese and koreans have 7 and 10 years. I believe the American car makers have learned a lot about this after getting trounced in the market. They have been extending there warranties and covering parts that weren't covered before.
But it's not until you get into the really high-tech stuff that American builds even show up. Like 7-10 layer circuit boards, aerospace equipment, military hardware, and extreme environment hardware. To put it another way, the Americans, Japanese, and Germans sell the equipment to China to build the stuff they sell.