Well if one wants to be cynical that's how big fortunes and generally big advantages to self happen.
That is behaving selfishly and somehow manage to avoid repercussions.
Just two examples from stuff that is in the news these days:
1) The grift happened during the War on terror (especially 2001-2010) which somehow was never investigated
2) Members of the rock band "The Rolling Stones" . They cumulatively slept with thousands of married women and women in relationships. They all somehow managed to avoid the husbands and boyfriends looking for their wives. Most of them had homicidal intent against Mick Jagger and their unfaithful wife.
That bit made me suspect the study - that the "leader" ate the cookie is believable, that they did so in a semi-vindictive manner is not believable.
I want to see the actual study.
https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/working-papers...
In short, it doesn't address the concerns I list in my post.