Hacker News Reader

Comment by octopoc | Hacker News Reader

I mean if you used an SDR in your consumer product. Let's say you make a dual purpose LoRa / WiFi radio to put in vehicles for a fleet management solution. If you use an SDR, you'd have to lock it down with DRM to prevent end users from repurposing it.

View on HN

Using an SDR for this kind of product would be horribly cost and time inefficient. You would design it with off the shelf WLAN and LoRa ICs.

> If you use an SDR, you'd have to lock it down with DRM to prevent end users from repurposing it.

Not any more so than a product you designed that didn't use an SDR as its core.

Yes, but the same applies to your WiFi router even if it has hardware filters. Its simply a certification requirement.

That doesn't have anything to do with LimeSDR. This is already not a product that is certified for anything. It exists in a very gray zone where anyone using it for transmission is likely in violation of the law unless they obtained a development/testing license in the specific band they are using.

The easiest way to leave the gray zone would be to get a ham radio license. Although this might vary from country to country, generally you are allowed to use selfbuilt transmitters in specific frequency ranges, which also includes noncertified hardware.

I'm not too sure about that. Having a HAM radio license would allow you to transmit on bands licensed for HAM usage. A lot of the stuff that people want SDRs for (especially for transmitting) lies outside of those bands.

> likely in violation of the law...development/testing license

Or they just have a ham radio license

In a Faraday cage, no one can hear you transmit...

Or put the unit in a faraday cage to carry out testing. I believe a lot of people do this to allow them to play with transmission while not breaking any laws.

Well, it would also cost at least 10x what a dual purpose LoRA/WiFi radio would cost if it were built out of LoRa parts from Semtech and an ESP-32.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com