I really, really like this comparison.
If we fed our bodies in the same way we let tech company algorithms feed our minds, we’d have three Big Macs for breakfast washed down with a shot of whiskey and a couple lines of cocaine
I really, really like this comparison.
If we fed our bodies in the same way we let tech company algorithms feed our minds, we’d have three Big Macs for breakfast washed down with a shot of whiskey and a couple lines of cocaine
We live in an obesogenic environment. Yeah, people with reserves of health, wealth and wisdom can buck the trends by applying time and energy to fighting against the tide but if the average person is falling for this stuff, the battle's already lost as the insanity becomes normal.
When I look at countries like Japan I don't see a limit in food choices, but I see a lot more healthy people.
[0] https://theconversation.com/how-marketers-condition-us-to-bu... [1] https://cspinet.org/protecting-our-health/nutrition/unhealth...
Maybe in another decade or two we'll see a similar shift in the digital space.
I would guess that processed/high-sugar foods today are where cigarettes were in the 90s. Everybody knows and accepts how bad they are, many people have changed their habits accordingly, many people haven't.
Digital media on the other hand is more like where cigarettes were in the 70s. Most people know roughly that they're bad for you, but few do anything about it.
That was essentially what Hunter S Thompson used to have for breakfast, just with cigarettes instead of McDonalds [1]
[1] https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/33487/hunter-s-thompsons...
But that's a normal breakfast?
Maybe it's more like eating only rabbits: rabbits for breakfast, rabbits for lunch, rabbits for dinner until you starve
https://fourtallpalms.com/why-rabbit-meat-is-not-the-best-su...
>If there are enough rabbits, the people eat till their stomachs are distended; but no matter how much they eat they feel unsatisfied.