That seems like a crude way of thinking about this. It's more like "This is my property, it was stolen, give me my property back."
Originally, crypto enthusiasts - especially the ones with an anarchist streak - were into the idea that crypto would exist completely outside of government control, i.e. the government wouldn't even recognize it as property. So if thieves trick you into sending coins to the wrong address, tough luck, you should've been more careful.
To sue in court over property theft means the government must recognize crypto as property, and as such, crypto is brought into the fold of government oversight.
Laws enshrine property.
Bitcoin is a legal gray area. I'm sure it'll shape up some way or another, but maybe not the way we expect.