Either way I think this move is at minimum neutral and probably a net good.
Either way I think this move is at minimum neutral and probably a net good.
A free gift with string attached is not a free gift. The patents are not worth the lawsuit and fees. This has negative preditory value.
It is fake source.
Why is it even possible for them to patent stuff like this? There should be no IP to own in the first place.
This kind of defensive use of patents I’m actually ok with. Indie firms who can’t afford expensive patent disputes benefits and in the mean time it protects EA against larger firms.
The bigger issue here isn’t the clause, it’s peoples dislike of EA. Sure EA have earned that distrust but this isn’t one of their shitty moves.
Plus as I’ve said before, this kind of clause is really quite common. Even FOSS has done it on occasions