Dying in the Name of Vaccine Freedom

Can someone tell me why VAERS reports are not strictly mandated for all observed AEFIs?

Anyone who says vaccines are safe, when there is no method to strictly monitor observed AEFIs, is perpetuating a blatent lie.

Without people having an option to reject a vaccine, and without an option to claim liability, and without an efficient AEFI monitoring in place, there is absolutely little incentive for the vaccine producers to ensure the quality. The is economics 101. It is sad that such blatant deceptions are possible in todays world...

And people who are refusing to bend down is fighting against this eventuality...shame on the shills who are making propoganda where they are cutting the branch they are sitting on...

Pretty much everything these down-to-earth people are saying is true. If you accept the government's cunningly-constructed arguments, then there's no injection you could ever refuse -- they'll just say that failure to accept the injection is putting people's lives at risk, and that's supposed to trump all other considerations.

Meanwhile, this report is deeply deceptive. They show us sick people to frighten us. But the NYT is either malicious or incompetent not to mention that effective treatments are available, such as the MATH+ protocol developed by Dr. Varon et al. Varon apparently attributes his much higher than average success rate at least partially to the use of ivermectin, information that the NYT and many other media outlets have helped keep buried.

They say that the patient they interviewed died. It's supposed to be a chilling finale, an exclamation point that proves their point. But I can easily go find ten examples of young healthy people being promptly killed by the vaccine, i.e., going from excellent health to having heart attacks or strokes at the age of 25 or whatever. Anyone who doubts that this is possible should check the off-the-charts VAERS reports for the vaccines, which dwarf all the reports from the past few decades combined. Again, not mentioned by the NYT.

At the NYT and other propaganda outlets, the conclusions come first, and then half-hearted "investigation" is done to support those conclusions.