“Seriously people — STOP BUYING MASKS!” he wrote in a tweet that was later deleted. “They are NOT effective in preventing general public from catching #Coronavirus, but if healthcare providers can’t get them to care for sick patients, it puts them and our communities at risk!”
This is a good article about the changing position on masks: https://www.latimes.com/science/story/2021-07-27/timeline-cd...
Here are a few other sources I found with a quick google search:
https://www.aaha.org/publications/newstat/articles/2020-03/c...
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/surgeon-general-wants-you-...
marketwatch.com/story/the-cdc-says-americans-dont-have-to-wear-facemasks-because-of-coronavirus-2020-01-30
What happened subsequently was a shift to cooperative masks whose benefit is primarily reducing transmission from the wearer.
These two things are both discussed under the header of "masks" but they are very different interventions. It's less that the position changed, it's more that what authorities were actually talking about changed.
You can fairly argue that this counts as a messaging failure and I'd agree, but a lot of people seem to be missing what the issue actually was (especially some who set this up as dishonesty or an attack on expertise).
I for one, am glad that N95s haven't been mandated. I found them extremely irritating when I had to wear them because of high pollution in Beijing. The masks we wear instead, in comparison, are much more comfortable.
They later had evidence that COVID was aerosol transmitted - masks for everyone make more sense in that scenario.