I'm trying to ignore the name calling for a second. What really struck me is this, though:
The post says:
"2. Have a single point of contact: the CEO. Part of this crisis got worse because numerous people have been speaking to the press. The first thing you should do if you are in a crisis is appoint ONE PERSON to speak to the press and represent the company. That person should be the CEO. Not Paul Graham. Not the PR team. Not some VP. Not friends. Not off the record sources. Not anyone else except the CEO. (...)"
I'd argue that
- posting this thing in general was already a violation of that rule, i.e. public advice as someone close to the company
- continuing the discussion in the comments, after posting that there shouldn't be any communication except through the CEO.
I mean.. It sounds like he wrote 'Shut up everyone, including PG' and then he continues to comment..? Am I misreading the initial statement (certainly possible) or is this a ~mismatch~?