Oh look, an Econ professor doesn’t understand technology or real markets and can’t even make a point in his essay.
Maybe that’s why Clemson’s Econ program isn’t even in the top 50…
Maybe that’s why Clemson’s Econ program isn’t even in the top 50…
There’s no actual argument, thesis, or contextual background.
And yes, the irrelevancy of his department is contextually relevant to this discussion.