Rescue dogs shot dead by NSW council due to Covid-19 restrictions
smh.com.au
smh.com.au
ooo career ending move there.
I'm amused, myself, how little coverage the zoonotic transmission of COVID gets. It's not even "misinformation", its just not discussed much.
Perhaps they're saving it for a serious conflict later. "They're coming to kill Fluffy" might get people to take up arms.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/bears-bab...
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-07-06/big-cats...
Speaks of a company "Zoetis" and says "Confirmed coronavirus cases have been found in gorillas, tigers and lions at zoos, and in domestic cats and dogs."
They don't discuss this because it would make it clear that "the whole world gets vaccinated and Covid goes away" is a pipe dream.
>A source who is familiar with the arrangement said the shelter volunteers are distressed and had COVID-safe measures in place to handle the dogs, one of which was a new mother.
>According to NSW Health, there have been no recent locally acquired COVID-19 cases in Cobar,
So, it was too dangerous to travel in an area with no covid cases and bring dogs to a shelter with full covid protocols and the only alternative was to shoot the dogs?
This is just getting excessive, there's being safe and then there's I don't even know what you call that. There definitely had to be a better way to deal with that situation.
>The Office of Local Government Minister Shelley Hancock, who has previously faced questions in Parliament over the shooting of animals in council pounds,
Although, sounds like the council has had issues with shooting animals in pounds before.
This story is just an unusually depressing example among already depressing examples.