Maybe if you define smartness as academic smartness, which is learned on a course.
Practical smarts has probably declined as a result.
Practical smarts has probably declined as a result.
I know the stereotype, but is there any evidence that “book smarts” and “street smarts” are mutually exclusive?
Is it possibly an artifact of an economy rewarding hyper-specialization?
I'm not sure if the whole book smart / street smart thing is a good example of what you're saying. Wouldn't that just be an example of people becoming well adapted to their environment (or in fact manipulating their environment)?