Anonymous releases internal data on another FBI contractor, ManTech
thepiratebay.org
thepiratebay.org
Edit: this was far too good to pass up. By far the most damning thing I've found: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/36733961/Funny%20Pictures.docx
That's right. A bunch of 'funny' pictures, pasted into a word document, and saved on the company server. Your tax dollars at work, ladies and gents.
FYI they are also adding this link for newbies in the header http://ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html that actually mentions the "LOL" comment thing.
Email addresses. They're common, but these aren't just any emails. We can now attach these address to a specific organization and try to target them to get the information we want; if there is any in their inboxes. Think OpSec.
Bids and purchase orders. This takes time, as you actually have to read them, but you can find prices and bidding tactics of ManTech and maybe undermine them next time around. OR as entrepreneurs you can read them and learn how to acquire government contracts.
Tons of employee IDs in there used to login and out of services. You can guess why these are important.
They were in negotiations ~2005 with NATO to undertake maintenance of SatCom Afghanistan. Do some research, find out if they have the contract, new vector to exploit; very nice pay off. From the same document we learn a valuable piece of information about how NATO accepts bids from clients:
----
This will be a competitive procurement. We will be up against large American and European firms. We were informed that NATO puts a requirement for a Bid Bond in their RFPs to eliminate some of the small firms from the newer NATO countries that are part of the former Soviet Union. Experience has shown, over the past year, that these small firms tend to low bid on the basis of a lower wage base in their countries. We do not believe that this procurement lends itself to that bidding environment as the dollar value and the Bid Bond requirement may preclude these small firms from bidding but, nevertheless, price will be the determining factor.
----
In fact, all of the SatCom.doc file is interesting.
There are usernames and passwords in an .xls files. They all share the same password as well. Maybe it works the same in other places on their intranet?
To be honest, a lot of the material is outdated and none of it is particularly interesting. Sure, you can learn a lot from it... but it's not bleed edge. So take it for what you will.
Also, I found 06b1 Contractor's response to labor questioned...doc particularly interesting. It shines a lot of light on the qualifications requirements, and how contractors do or do not live up to them. Definitely worth a read.
If only I'd read till the end...
Thanks for the tip. They appear to be default u-p pairs, that one would hope would be changed upon first login. Still, strange to see that lying around on a computer at a firm that provides security contracting for LE and the military.
"hey, I was just looking at file
23223140 003.pdf
and it looks like someone is getting WAY over billed on the materials. is it just me or are they charging $500 for a $30 wrench?"
IMO this is definitely not written in the same voice as previous statements. I am confident that experts would confirm this, it seems obvious. There is a cursory nod to maintaining the same style, but the voice just isn't there.
Now of course that's what we would expect if we believe topiary was arrested. However, the other possibility is apparently that he was not arrested and is in fact a swede pretending to be from the UK. In that case, the original voice was a very good imitation to start off with, so it would be trivial for him to drop it and sound more generic.
Completely lame for anybody outside the hacker culture. We're all looking for the juicy stuff, not lists of email addresses. I give this one a 7.