If not, there would likely be some who see this as a vehicle to clean up some holdings, depending on provenance.
https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/insights/articles/u-s-re...
That's not entirely true. The bank wants to know enough information to make sure that the cash came from the buyer, and not from someone else other than the buyer, for AML reasons as well as creditworthiness. So they do seek proof of the provenance of the cash sufficient to demonstrate that it actually came from the buyer.
(Source: detailed conversations with bankers when buying a home.)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/realestate/1989/05/06...
(family member is a mortgage underwriter)