I also thought that wasn't "fair" since many of the comparison images are taken with long exposure times.
I have a very old astronomy book that includes similar drawings of Jupiter and they're much more detailed and realistic.
I have a very old astronomy book that includes similar drawings of Jupiter and they're much more detailed and realistic.
The Hubble Ultra Deep Field image (a follow-up to the original 1995 Deep Field image of an "empty" region of sky), has a total exposure time of just under 1 million seconds (11 days), with single channel exposures of a minimum of about 1.5 days.
This somewhat exceeds the duration and light-collecting capabilities of a human observer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble_Ultra-Deep_Field
Though granted, such prolonged exposures aren't necessary for the nearer observations (many within the solar system) included in the article here.