Mormon Church Makes Bid To Acquire Facebook
brimdeforest.com
brimdeforest.com
A close friend of mine wrote a blog entry on this very topic in July - http://teddios.blogspot.com/2008/07/church-and-intertubes.ht...
I'm LDS myself - I studied Computer Science at BYU, and I worked in the massive underground data center and supercomputing facilities while I was there. The depth of technological sophistication and awareness that the church employs is pretty impressive.
Of course, this is all just anecdotal evidence; I just thought it was intersting.
That being said, I think that LDS is probably the most data-centric religious organization I can think of.
Edit: s/Possibly/Probably
Aren't they a little concerned that if they keep researching genealogy they might find out that, say, Native Americans are in fact not one of the tribes of Israel magically transported halfway across the world and "cursed" with dark skin as punishment for their sins? Because, y'know, that would pretty much prove their entire religion false.
Beyond that, I'm sure there that some of the original interest in genealogy had to do with attempts to prevent inadvertent incest during the years where polygamy was accepted.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baptism_for_the_dead#Genealogy_...
Internally, Facebook stock is being traded at about a $4 billion valuation...so an $8 billion offer, for example, would be practically impossible to turn down if we assume that the parties making the decision are at least a little interested in money. Zuck may be a good Jewish boy, but being a billionaire at twenty-five seems a hard offer to turn down, even if it means handing over the reins of your baby to a rather odd cult.
Unless, of course, Zuckerberg really does believe Facebook, and the "social graph", is as important as Google in the future of the Internet, in which case, the $15 billion valuation numbers indicated by the MS investment a couple years back would be lowball, and no offer the LDS could make would be sufficient. (I'm not on that bandwagon...but I know there are folks who are, and maybe Zuckerberg is one of them.)
http://secretenemyhideout.com/post/46652783/i-heard-from-an-...
.. and I know I'm totally going to get downmodded for mentioning VW - but the link to what the had is there for reference anyway.
"the specter of pairing it with one of the most detailed, accurate, and widespread social maps in existence (Facebook) is truly terrifying"
http://mattmaroon.com/?p=345 does a good job explaining why Facebook is not a "detailed" or "aaccurate" or "widespread" "social map".
If it is anything, I see it as a technology acquisition.
Sounds like lots of eggs in one basket for a company that certainly hasn't proven it's value yet.
edit: geez, I didn't think it would be this bad.