Hacker News Reader

Comment by qwph | Hacker News Reader

Something like that. It makes the following invalid in C++ but valid in C:

  int *ptr = NULL;

View on HN

Except for the fact that the real definition is actually more like:

    #ifdef __cplusplus
    #define __DARWIN_NULL __null
    #else /* ! __cplusplus */
    #define __DARWIN_NULL ((void *)0)
    #endif /* __cplusplus */

So the code you mentioned works just fine in C++.

Except that the actual compiler I was using was for the PlayStation 2, so I very much doubt it had that precise code you just outlined, and it really did have NULL defined as ((void* )0), and it really did break. I saw it happen.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com