It seems quite a few vaccinated people get COVID-19 but it seems very few get seriously ill. The protective effect seems to outweigh any infection-enhancing effect.
It seems quite a few vaccinated people get COVID-19 but it seems very few get seriously ill. The protective effect seems to outweigh any infection-enhancing effect.
You need to skate where the puck is going. If you look at the data coming out of Israel, which is ahead of everyone else on the curve with vaccinations (and also releases data without manipulating it first, unlike the US - which uses exponentially looser rules for diagnosing COVID in the unvaccinated versus the vaccinated), you get a very different story.
https://www.visiontimes.com/2021/08/08/israel-hospital-vacci...
Wait two months and the US and other countries will be where Israel is today.
The risk with ADE increases as antibody levels from the vaccinations wane. That's happening now.
I agree the source isn't great, but it's hard finding information that hasn't been spun by tech companies at this point. It's worth watching the data coming out of Israel.
...
> She said, “If we treat them early – early is the ticket – with ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, 80% of the people will not have to go to the hospital.”
I was under the impression that neither invermectin or hydroxychloroquine has been demonstrated to be effective. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.18.21252037v...
However you feel about vaccines being foisted on us by the devil, that article looks pretty shaky to me as a source of public health advice.
This gave me a chuckle and did not inspire confidence.
It's not only reasonable to hypothesize this is about control, to me it's irrational to think otherwise at this point.
Here is a meta analysis of 63 (so far) randomized double blind trials: https://ivmmeta.com/
This is a fake meta-analysis.
The most important study that weighted in IVM favor was bogus and was retracted some days ago.
Are you claiming that Ivermectin isn't effective as a repurposed outpatient therapy for COVID-19?
The CDC changed their guidance with PCR testing so a "breakthrough case" (i.e. a vaccinated person testing positive for COVID) is defined as 28 cycles or fewer, but gave no guidance about changing the PCR cycle count for unvaccinated (which remains in the 35-40 range most places).
This means it takes thousands of times less material to make an unvaccinated person a COVID "case" than a vaccinated person.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/health-departments/bre...
They constantly stealth-edit the page, so it's helpful to look at archived versions here: https://archive.is/https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/hea...
Here's an article about it: https://washingtonwatch.org/caught-red-handed-cdc-changes-te...