“neutral map” is just going to be used as cover for “favors democrats in republican states”
It sounds to me like you just don't like the possibility that "your side" might be doing something politically nefarious. And don't get me wrong, it's likely that both sides are gerrymandering. It just so happens that republicans have more governorships and other state power, and have had much more opportunity to draw districts.
You should be happy about the existence of mathematical tools to try to prove when someone in power is choosing their voters, instead of the voters choosing the person in power.
We’ve been through this before, with competing congressional apportionment algorithms.
Algorithms will fall into two groups: the first will favor Democrats in the real world and Republicans in the counterfactual swapped-dataset world, and the second will favor Republicans in the real world and Democrats in the counterfactual swapped-dataset world. There will be arguments that multiple algorithms, some from each group, are each the "fairest" by varying definitions. GP suspects that it will be mainly algorithms from the first group that end up being used.