In the thesis, it was not clear that the new font was easier to read than Arial.

[From a comment I made in the original submission.]

I read the tables in the thesis. There are 12 comparations between the Arial and the Dyslexie fonts, but only 2 of then have p<.1 and none of them has p<.05. So it is very difficult to know if the differences between the fonts are real or come from random noise.

I would be interested to see more related research too. We spend far too much time reading text so even a slight increase in readability is important, even for non-dyslexics