Other the fact that the brains of our entire specie has evolved for millions of years for this exact type of communication, there isn't anything magical, I guess...
The information bandwidth of in-person communication is absolutely unparalleled, even if technology can now match in latency.
Good luck replicating body language, eye contacts, subtle facial cues etc with Slack messages.
A great many people identify themselves as introverts or antisocial, and would feel much better being excluded from all these neuron triggers.
> The information bandwidth of in-person communication is absolutely unparalleled
Yes, but that bandwidth is not all used productively but wasted on irrelevant bits which do not matter and likely distract from the topic. Implying that more bandwidth helps is suggesting that a book can only be a tiny bit as effective as a video...
> Good luck replicating body language, eye contacts, subtle facial cues etc with Slack messages.
I wouldn't try. Such things are usually unnecessary to the task at hand, and often detrimental. I'm not going to replicate the odor of what my co-workers ate for lunch either, nor other clues about their general hygiene, nor would I want to even if it was easy to do.
Have you considered the mere possibility that many people's work have different types of tasks than yours?
It's so hard not to make stereotypical jokes about engineers when reading comments like this XD
Text is able to convey information that is not entirely technical as well... This seems to be something people miss.
Have you ever read a novel?
Not really, if you are not interested in communicating emotions or not interested in playing politics as part of the said communication..
In fact, in technical discussion, not conveying too much emotion is a great advantage..
But I'd just like to remind you that even the most hardcore engineering company cannot possibly having only technical discussions.
This really reminds me that how often HN miss the forest for the tree.
Your point is not very clear, sorry.
It seems that you have an emotional reaction to this topic, which seems to muddle your argument. May be take sometime to reflect and get back with more clarity?
I honestly don't know how is my point not clear. Being able to have both face to face communication and technology based remote communication is better than being limited to the latter alone. I thought that was a pretty straight forward point.
I was simply reminding you that whatever advantage Slack/Email has over in-person communication for technical discussions, they lose that advantage for non-technical discussions, which are just as quintessential for an organization.
Here on the internet, we settle for letting you watch downvotes trickle in over time.
And body language, eye contacts etc. are not necessarily useful for professional communication, these might as well be distracting and distorting a rational discussion.