The point is that your compensation should not be based on where you live, but how much value you add.
If you believe this, the 10% trade-off doesn't matter and is simply a distraction from the real discussion.
If you believe this, the 10% trade-off doesn't matter and is simply a distraction from the real discussion.
Well this seems rather naive view of things. Do these folks also pay same SFO/NYC rates for all services and infrastructure that they consume in cheaper area.
Doesn't a beautiful home in mountains add same value that a million dollar condo in silicon valley offer? But remote promoters seem happy to pay 200K for a mountain home. Because of this real estate agent will get only 20 percent of potential commission on this deal as compared to expensive city.