https://larepublica.pe/tecnologia/2020/06/14/facebook-volvio...
https://www.fayerwayer.com/2020/09/facebook-imagen-maldita-b...
You give each word a score and sum them together, completely ignoring context and meaning.
Edit: realizing this comes across as sarcastically anti-Semitic. This is a genuine question, I don't understand why a yiddishism would carry such connotations in the automated hate speech system.
https://www.yiddishbookcenter.org/collections/oral-histories...
Absent the original commenter (you) providing context, that makes for reasonable supposition. Automated systems learn from a corpus that includes internet anti-Semites using Yiddishisms in a mocking manner to insult and inflame leads to false-positives on real-world, genuine uses.
Similarly, how does one fish out the context and gauge just how appropriate (according to HN, never) a use of "n----r" and all its variants? Consider whether one should tell Joe Schmoe Black American he cannot use the word all to prevent Joe Schmoe White American from having a chance at using it to incite.
It's a hard problem with many a false-positive to be had in ways that will befuddle, outrage, and amuse.
And since practices like these only growing it will become norm in near future.
Spanish speakers have gotten into trouble for using the Spanish word for black in other contexts, like:
British audience misunderstanding Spanish phrase by an Uruguayan player.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-9104039/M...
https://elpais.com/deportes/2020-12-23/gracias-negrito-la-ac...
German players misunderstanding Spanish word:
https://apnews.com/article/sports-2020-tokyo-olympics-africa...?
https://twitter.com/Romein0omatic1/status/141646122833191322...
And other people want to be offended, even when there is no insult, just different cultural norms.