Hacker News Reader

Comment by angryasian | Hacker News Reader

this article is written with the obvious intention of bashing google, the writer didn't even do his research because honeycomb 3.2 source is available.

View on HN

Where? http://source.android.com/ just says 2.3 is available, and google isn't turning up anything either.

EDIT: looks like the GPL/LGPL parts have been released (according to news reports, anyhow). Can you point me to a full buildable android 3.2 repo?

Only the GPL/LGPL parts are available, but the Honeycomb code isn't viewed as ready for public consumption yet. My guess is that we'll finally see the code when Ice Cream Sandwich rolls out.

Some openness. Waiting for corporations to deem it fit for public scrutiny but not public usage? Makes me suspicious if they released all the GPL'd parts or if they missed some.

Sure, but that was exactly what the author meant.

Oh, okay, so that makes it okay for the site to be Chrome-only despite Google's constant proselytizing over "openness."

"this article is written with the obvious intention of bashing google" i agree, it is way faster to develop for just 1 browser, plus we should be celebrating people are trying to break ground doing this awesome videos, i can only begin to imagine all the impressive work that what went into this video, good one google +1

I hope this was sarcastic, unfortunately I fear you're actually serious.

Scary.

out of curiosity why?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com