Hacker News Reader

“Safe” is the wrong criterion.

The right criterion: “Less dangerous than the disease itself”.

What about those who've been ill, recovered, and have natural antibodies?

The vaccine provides better protection than natural antibodies: https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/s0806-vaccination-pr....

Isn’t that the n=234 study that’s not an RCT?

You say that like 234 is supposed to be a low number?

What about if the person cannot receive the vaccine due to a known and accepted risk? Are antibodies a suitable alternative?