Hacker News Reader

Comment by actually_a_dog | Hacker News Reader

Unfortunately, I think it is widely appreciated: by people who use it to mock the term “global warming.” I know it’s outdated terminology, but one still sees it used occasionally as a synonym for “climate change.”

View on HN

Climate Change sounds cute and cuddly. Global Weather Chaos is a term I prefer since it describes what will be affected and implies that it grows more energetic as well as 'bad' in layperson impressions.

A political consultant in the 2000s specifically recommended “climate change” [1] as a term that sounds less alarming. A more recent study suggested that “climate crisis” [2] does a better job at catching people’s attention.

[1]: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2003/mar/04/usnews.c...

[2]: https://grist.org/article/why-your-brain-doesnt-register-the...

Catching attention doesn't necessarily help if it instinctively sets someone against you. I think climate change is the correct term in that it's reasonably objective, but climate chaos is ingenious for the visceral depiction of what things are going to be like going forward.

I like that. But Chaos sounds a little bit like chance/random, throwing the burden of action away.

I can't think of a word to truly feel how life on the line huge this crisis is?

Climate Catastrophe is what I have been using. But with $ for eyeballs news pushing so many tragedies so it loses it's punch. Mad Men Don Draper has a good rant about degrading the word love.

To me, "Catastrophe" also removes the burden of action by framing climate change as a fait accompli. It makes it sound like something that has already happened and now we need to deal with the consequences, rather than something we must act to stop. (I appreciate that in reality it is both.) I like "Climate Crisis" more because everyone understands a crisis as something that must be solved urgently.

Yeah I like crisis too. words are hard!! maybe we should just stack a bunch of adjectives together ;)

I like "Climate Catastrophe" more than "Climate Crisis" which is the term in vogue in left wing circles here in Britain. But I think I still prefer Climate Change because to me the other terms fail to relate that what's happened is we've hijacked earth's systems and it's changing in response.

For me, crisis and catastrophe are too immediate and too direct. What's insidious about the climate is how diffuse and difficult to comprehend it is. Additionally, while I do expect a lot of peoples lives to get more difficult in the coming decades (at least re: weather) it is by no means the end of the world, excepting of course island communities and countries for whom it literally is. That I am happy to call a crisis.

I prefer something like “everybody alive past 2035 is royally fucked if we don’t do something now.” But, hey, that’s just me.

I leave off the conditional.

I’ve noticed most the climate scientists and related people are using the term “climate emergency” now. It’s a lot clearer.

Global warming is still the current terminology. As is climate change. Global -- as in at a global scale -- warming is the mechanism that is leading to climate change, even where that can even mean colder conditions at a local level.

There is nothing outdated about it.

I see a lot more climate change anecdotally. I think it's a response to the classic "bUt It'S sNoWiNg RiGhT nOw In (somewhere usually warm)" response from climate deniers.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com