> "I’m going to go ahead and sort of disagree with you there."
Either you didn't realize it was a quote and are lying, or you have serious issues with communicating in the English language.
> it’s still useless rhetoric
Why?
Either you didn't realize it was a quote and are lying, or you have serious issues with communicating in the English language.
> it’s still useless rhetoric
Why?
It’s useless rhetoric because after we agree humans will always see winners and losers, there are no further conclusions to draw. Does that mean humans will always expect a certain portion of people to be homeless, hungry, unhealthy, depressed, etc? Or does that mean that even once humans are all homed, fed, heathy and in good spirits that there will be some other metric to decide people are winning or losing life at?
This solipsistic relativism can’t be applied in any particular way.