As deadly weather disasters sweep globe, is a 1.5°C warming target impossible?
timesofisrael.com
timesofisrael.com
Given the disparity between renewables and fossil fuels currently in use, Nuclear Energy is the most likely candidate to offset energy use but corporations can't be trusted to run these kind of facilities.
Its already been noted that some carbon sinks appear to have become net carbon producers recently. Russian permafrost, and the Amazon. Basically it can happen when methane and other gases from the arctic/permafrost melt or natural disasters (large scale fires).
Carbon capture also isn't the only factor in a solution, trapped heat will need to escape the atmosphere to space and that can only happen at certain narrow wavelengths.
In most cases, very little attention is given to cascade failures in general, because in most cases its difficult to quantify the risk, and the worst disasters we see are often the result of these type of failures.
Is carbon capture a reasonable hope? What we can do to increase our odds that we figure that out before we start suffering real population collapse?
How much of an idea do we actually have of what a 3- or 4-degree warmer world will look like? How much do we think we can predict and how much falls under "this is a huge chaotic system and we can't know"?
> The joint venture project between NRG Energy Inc and Japan’s JX Nippon had received a $190 million grant from the U.S. government. Before being mothballed, it was the only U.S. project capturing carbon from a coal-fired power plant.
> Since Petra Nova started up in 2017, it suffered outages on 367 days, according to a technical report it sent to the DOE in March. Issues with the carbon-capture facility accounted for more than a quarter of the outage days, followed by problems with the plant’s dedicated natural gas power unit, according to the report.
> The facility also missed its carbon capture targets by about 17%: It captured 3.8 million short tons of carbon dioxide during its first three years, shy of the 4.6 million short tons developers had expected.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_capture_and_storage
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-energy-carbon-capture...
So from a societal function perspective, carbon capture is the the only way
https://www.reuters.com/business/sustainable-business/eu-pro...
That number supposedly represents wealth but how does letting climate change happen maintain wealth?