(One word more) relevant XKCD [1].
Also, a generator for the above [2].
[1] https://xkcd.com/936/ [2] https://www.correcthorsebatterystaple.net/
Also, a generator for the above [2].
[1] https://xkcd.com/936/ [2] https://www.correcthorsebatterystaple.net/
It seems a lot of people took the xkcd at face value.
[0] https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2012/08/13/correcthorsebatt...
Or some people stopped caring
If a system requires an account/password, and people find ways to bypass or weaken account security, perhaps you shouldn't be using accounts.
In days of yore, "cypherpunk/cypherpunk" or "cypherpunks/cypherpunks" was a common convention. Those are found 140 and 38 times respectively in haveibeenpwned.
Considering many systems went out of their way to prevent / disable such accounts, and the convention fell out of practice, that's notable.
int random() {
return 4; // randomly chosen by roll of a fair dice
}In a similar vein, React intentionally calls user-implemented functions which are meant to be pure twice in a row (even though that's technically unnecessary), just to ensure the programmer actually makes the function pure (so the application behaves reproducably in the future).