I don't think any reasonable person interpreted this as 'will never see even a single mosquito', come on.
The actual title has the advantage of a passable resemblance to English grammar and correct usage, and doesn't suggest that a certain nonzero quantity of mosquitoes is to be normatively preferred. More accurate at the expense of being less terse, while not sacrificing those advantages, would be something like “Why Disney World has fewer mosquitoes than might otherwise be expected”.
>Considering its location smack-dab in the middle of Florida swamp territory, it’s hard to believe that there are no mosquitoes in Disney World, but trust us, it’s true.
I would also believe it that there are no African bullfrogs in the park.
"No mosquitoes" and "never" are pretty definitive.
I suspect these stories were planted or at least seeded by Disney.
They do put in a fair amount of effort. However, a much more effective solution would be to avoid having large bodies of water near people, but that would make the park less visually appealing.
But I was blindsided by my hatred of mosquitos.
But if supplies of insect repellent are needed, then there's a lot more than that.
Get it to the point where less than 1% of people get bit and we can start to talk about "doesn't have mosquitoes"