Your "melting pot" interpretation concretely just means "they should not be different or receive different things than me".
Your "melting pot" interpretation concretely just means "they should not be different or receive different things than me".
No, it doesn’t, and that makes no sense. The melting pot idea means that everyone works toward a cohesive national identity and recognizes contributions from everyone. It doesn’t mean that every group should be separate and excluded from each other.
Lemme ask you another question since we're asking silly questions: should Telemundo and Univision be illegal to broadcast in the US because its not in English (cohesive national identity, right?)? Cause that's what you sound like.
You are being sarcastic and not engaging in good faith.
Sure, lets deescalate: are their broadcasting in America and commensurate content choices discriminatory or working against a cohesive national identity?
> You are being sarcastic and not engaging in good faith.
But I find the last bit ironic
In response to your question, yes I would hope that as Latinos continue to become a larger portion of the population, they join the overall “American” culture and influence it. Not remain as a separate group with a separate language and separate media.
If you look at the statistics, this already happens. Second and third generation Latinos identify more as American than as Latino.