You want ones with numbers, 99.97% is a good number to find, you can get it on big Honeywell filters.
While incredibly difficult to find, there are MPR 2800 rated furnace filters which are better than HEPA.
From that point of view, even a 90% catch rate sounds fine.
The takeaway is that less particle efficient filters won't ever get you down to the same steady state as better filters in real world applications.
And from personal experience with filters and devices to measure airborne particles, it is hard enough getting good numbers with the best filters I can find.
I shake out the pre-filter (gets covered in dust and pet dander) and toss out the filters every ~6 months. I use a filtrate 1900 filter for the home air filter.
Tip: never use the "ionic" button. They come on most filters for some bizarre reason, but ionically charging the air is a bad idea.
Why?
No it doesn’t. Who told you that? Ozone generators are a completely different thing and air ionizers must conform to low ozone emission standards.
> No it doesn’t.
Yes, it does.
> Who told you that?
Among others, the EPA [0].
> Ozone generators are a completely different thing
They are, but ionizing air cleaners still generate ozone even though they are different than “ozone generators”. [0, again]
> and air ionizers must conform to low ozone emission standards.
No, only the small minority that claim health benefits in a manner which brings them under FDA medical device regulatory authority do. [0, again.] But even those so regulated in ozone emissions are net ozone generators.
[0] https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/what-are-ionizers...
Here’s an outline on how to go from the common rating, CADR, to various parameters that are of interest:
People will talk about CADR but also look at TCO.
I still recommend just spending the 150 bucks on a Winex or Coway. Then you have true hepa, plus filters that last a year.