They sort of have to, you can't selectively enforce trademarks like you can with other IP
For starters - PureOaty sounds nothing like Oatly. Secondly, it's made on minuscule scale at one farm from what I can make out.
but yeah Oaty vs Oatly might have been reasonable but PureOaty is quite the stretch
If the defendants had been selling their product with the exact same name, or ripping off their logo directly, then you have a point.
This is the UK, where digital reproductions of public domain documents do get a copyright. While I agree they overstep here (especially that a regular customer would see the two products differently), IP laws in UK are much more sensitive with these issues.