Unless the entire stack you’re using is audited and open source this sort of thing is inevitable.
As far as this is concerned, seems like if you don’t use iMessage or iCloud you’re safe for now.
As far as this is concerned, seems like if you don’t use iMessage or iCloud you’re safe for now.
Yes, this is correct. The Messages feature only applies to children under 18 who are in an iCloud Family, and the photo library feature only applies if you are using iCloud Photos.
Frankly, if you have an abusive partner with physical control over you and a willingness to do this, the fact that Apple supports this technology is the least of your problems.
You can’t ser this to other accounts on you family remotely.
> This feature can be turned on or off by parents.
1. Send someone you hate a message with cartoon making fun of tyrant-president.
2. That person is now on a list.
Its swatting-as-a-service.
- Photos scanning in Messages is on-device only (no reporting to govt.) and doesn't turn on unless you're an adult who turns it on for a minor via Family Sharing controls. - iCloud Photos scanning doesn't take effect unless you save the photo and it's already in a database of flagged photos. So in your scenario, you'd have to save the photo received from the unknown number to get flagged.
Whew! I was worried there for a minute. Maybe for extra safety I could say "SIRI I DISAVOW OF THIS MESSAGE!"??
If a kilo of heroin just showed up in the back seat of my car, I'd throw it out the window and try not to think about it. I certainly wouldn't bring it to the police, because mere possession is a serious crime.
CP is the same way, except it comes with a nice audit trail which could sink me even if I delete it immediately. Do I risk that, or do I risk the FBI deciding I'm a Person of Interest because I reported the incident in good faith?
There are no good choices there.
And that includes the FBI.
Ie unless you're replying to purely the swatting part, the article seems to support this. Specifically a prediction that governments will creep on legally requiring Apple to push custom classifiers:
> Apple’s changes would enable such screening, takedown, and reporting in its end-to-end messaging. The abuse cases are easy to imagine: governments that outlaw homosexuality might require the classifier to be trained to restrict apparent LGBTQ+ content, or an authoritarian regime might demand the classifier be able to spot popular satirical images or protest flyers.
The iMessage feature is not a database comparison system, it's to keep kids from getting/receiving nudes unexpectedly – and it works based on classifying those images.
I don't dispute this is a slippery slope - one could imagine that a government requires Apple to modify it's classification system. However, that would presumably require a software update since it happens on device.