https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.qua...
https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.qua...
Speaking as a former mathematician, I don't think problems are being solved any faster lately, but we hear about it more outside of academia because this is something that Quanta has started covering.
As an example, you could look only at Saharon Shelah, one of the co-authors of this result and a giant in the fields of model theory and set theory. He has spent a career settling long-standing open problems, including Whitehead's problem and Morley's problem. Until this Quanta series, Shelah's work didn't get much coverage outside mathematics as far as I know, but results of this caliber are not atypical for him. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saharon_Shelah#Academic_career
You'd think something as straight forward as (boolean) logic would converge on a standard notation. But I'm not familiar with the mathematics field to really criticize this. Regardless I found it to be a large barrier-to-entry which over complicated something when I was hoping to find direct analogies not needing constant 'translation'.
I am strongly against prescriptivism telling people that a bad translation that makes no sense is correct. I recommend "assuming the conclusion" as a correct name.
The use of the filled club ♣ makes the whole thing look like it's been sneezed on by someone who's just come off a shift in a coal-mine.
There are 1087 published research papers here if you'd like to browse ... https://shelah.logic.at/paper-list/
Holy crap. I've got about a dozen articles in preparation. Not a one of them is in Shelah's league