> Perhaps heed the warnings?
And then take what actions, exactly? “Guys this is trouble” is …fine, but without “and we should therefore do”, it’s just kind of spitting into the wind.
And then take what actions, exactly? “Guys this is trouble” is …fine, but without “and we should therefore do”, it’s just kind of spitting into the wind.
People: Ignore warning, buy iPhone
You: "Don't buy Apple products" isn't an action.
What is the follow-on? Which products should we buy then? Any phone other than Apple's? None?
Google phone? This is not an alternative if you care about privacy.
The allegory presented sounds insane (growing your own food) but honestly if you're not rolling your own flashed ROM on a 'droid then your privacy is dead already;
I understand throwing all your eggs in one basket is a terrible idea but Apples walled garden and heavy sandboxing was at least somewhat protective.
While the Pinephone isn't perfect yet, I would argue it will be able to replace Android/iOS in a few months.
Yeah this is the mobile phone equivalent of growing your own vegetables.
I get it, I'm a techy, but until the day is here where rooted phones aren't treated like a special case: for most people if they buy a droid then it's actually significantly worse for their personal privacy than an Apple device.
I don't want that to be the case, but until the pine phone is here and starts being a reasonable alternative; that's how it is.
Sadly...I know. The unfortunate thing is my recommendation for my family/friends for a phone is an iPhone, because it really is the best for security/privacy today, and they at least support their phones for much longer than an Android.
> I don't want that to be the case, but until the pine phone is here and starts being a reasonable alternative; that's how it is.
Fortunately, I think that time is coming sooner than later.
Someone will have to buy the pine phone when it is not a reasonable alternative to support the effort and keep the ball rolling.
It's no surprise why we got to this point.
Because that's who I'm speaking for.
The issue is that "the masses" just "go with the flow" and act like if everybody else is jumping off a cliff then it's ok to jump off a cliff too, and it is these mobs that move the markets and determine which products and services become the most popular.
However, in relatively free countries it is still possible to live one's life on one's own terms and not be in the same herd with the sheeple. It is definitely possible to live life without an iPhone and to have an Android phone with F-Droid rather than the Google Play Store as one's primary phone.
It doesn't even need to be an "action". You will have to be at least conscious of what is happening.
That is not what is happening, right now ( or before that ) many are defending Apple, and also an attitude of not "my problem". Writing off any warning as either pessimistic or conspiracy. Having some healthy dose of skepticism is somewhat an unpopular view in modern day society. Especially in Tech and America.
An action could and will be taken once enough people are conscious of what is happening. Right now the scale and critical mass just isn't there (yet).
BTW I think one of the roots of our problem is that we seem to end up in these really weird "winner take all" distributions with only 2-3 main winners and rarely any serious alternatives. It happens with operating systems, browsers, it also happens within programming language communities, like Javascript, etc. Everybody piles up into one of the 2-3 most popular framework options (React, etc). Same thing for Linux distributions. etc.
It would be nice if we could figure out some sort of nudge or hack that would reduce this tendency and encourage more distribution of mass.
Issues are also being found way faster simply due to a bigger user base.
Don’t buy or use their products.
The only progress for things like this comes at the political level, through pressure on politicians or corporations. That’s where you should be spending effort if this sort of thing matters to you.
A few Linux nerds buying some fantasy spook-free glibertarian phone will not make a dent in the problem.
Still good to keep up the pressure on public officials. That any interior minister is very happy about that doesn't have to be excused. Anyone else should be more like French people.
However I do think there’s value in gentle, consistent evangelism of privacy in ways that don’t make people feel bad. Most folks actually don’t want their deeply private stuff to be accessible. I’ve found that there are good analogies and ways to think about it that folks can get on board with and start caring to some extent.
I absolutely agree that political progress is the ultimate solution. I think the only way that will happen is if enough people demand it.