Also, it would be good if posts that have made it to the front page were removed from the new page freeing up even more space.
I personally simply forget there's a /new/ much of the time, having the option to have new posts passively presented while I'm skimming would be tremendously helpful.
I would really dislike it if those stories were removed. If it's only been an hour or two since I've gone through the front page then it's unlikely that there will be more than a couple of new stories there. Instead of rereading every title on the front page I can just go to the new page and scan for articles with scores above whatever threshold I'm in the mood for until I recognize one of them. Giving some indication that a post has been flagged might be nice but I don't see why having the new front page stories on the new page is a bad thing.
Incidentally, this poll has guilt tripped me into checking the new page again.
So I no longer visit the new page very much any more.
I usually hit the site, and there are 4 or 5 stories that interest me. I check them out, comment, and then by that time my mind has moved on to something else.
Too bad I can't display HN in 2 columns, top stories on the left, New on the right.
What is the "'old' section" implied?
The submissions go there first, and bubble up to HN main page only if they get enough upvotes.
This kind of question is pretty useless as a poll, if pg shows actual statistics I think it would be pretty far off.
1. Sometimes I've read a few pages of popular articles and I want something fresh.
2. To be weird and observe spam. I get sad when I see spam on HN and do my best not to comment on spam posts just like I have to try very hard not to reply to email spam with some choice words.
3. Upvote the gems I find in the new section.
I must say I do a lot of lurking... more lurking than up/down voting but those are my reasons for visitng the New section.