It's even mentioned that the launch is largely symbolic, as the work is already open source, but that this is a sort of "call to arms".
Seems pretty easy to understand.
I think that's really fair feedback FWIW.
> would've been to write an RFC to some mailing list
I don't think this is a thing in Rust, but there is a user forum/ subreddit.
> I'm sure they'll learn as they go along, and I probably am being way to harsh on people who actually are trying to do something good for the community.
Yeah I think that's all I'm saying. Maybe this is the wrong venue, but I don't think your criticism was necessary or constructive in totality - some of it is, some of it isn't. I'm sure that much of this feedback will be incorporated, based on what I'm seeing from the author.
The reason why the GitHub organization was created BEFORE anything else was because of a tweet. I originally tweeted that I created the organization, and wanted to see if people were interested in using it (regardless of ownership). It unexpectedly blew up, and with encouragement from replies/DMs, I decided to add least plant a flag.
> WHO
This needs to be better clarified, I agree. This is a small section on this: https://github.com/rust-cloud-native/core#owners-and-members
> WHAT
This could be clearer as well. Perhaps, this section should indicate that we want to be a blank canvas or sandbox for issue/discussion filers to determine course: https://github.com/rust-cloud-native/core#what-are-the-goals...