Fine - so you're taking the "oppressive" act definition as opposed to the singular ruler.

Let's continue to unpack that - "opressive" implies "unreasonable" acts

Continue "unreasonable" suggests that the actions conform to no reason

So your point about tyranny effectively becomes that you don't think masks or ensuring that people interact less reduces the spread of COVID. However there's real evidence of both of those things helping reduce the spread.

Effectively your argument is that you don't want to do a thing, so someone making you do that thing is a tyrant?

I'm not sure we get anywhere else on this.