The Inter typeface family
rsms.me
rsms.me
Inter is the kind of font that you use when you need something that just works. Not too fancy, not too simple, it's perfect for so many things. And it's free. And it's open source [1]. What's not to like!
[0] https://rsms.me/work [1] https://github.com/rsms/inter
Edit: it's also not a new thing, and not a 'new SF clone' - it's been around since 2016[2].
It's a great general purpose font, but not the best for UX/UI. SF Pro has SF Pro Compact to deal with aforementioned issues (It is used on Apple Watch).
Large x-heights make me sad; I think they're helpful in screens the size of a phone or smaller, but I don't like them on desktops. Inter's x-heights are already beyond my personal aesthetic tastes.
Taller x-heights leads to better optical legibility in small sizes.
Shorter x-heights are usually found in fonts such as Source Serif Pro for obvious reasons - it leads to be better shape recognition of the words and improved readability. Excellent in long prose and text use. Usually "Book" fonts have very short x-height. One of my favorites is Nexus Serif: https://www.martinmajoor.com/4_nexus.html
For UX/UI - ever wondered by EXIT signs are in all caps and not written as Exit? It's because of the relation of x-height to legibility at small sizes or larger distances. This is the same for avionics, warning labels, etc.
Inter isn't a good font for UX/UI IMO for the same reason why Helvetica and SF Pro aren't. They're general purpose fonts - neither good at text nor UX/UI but somewhere in the middle.
As for tracking, it’s already a good practice to use a slightly higher `letter-spacing` value at small sizes (something UIkit does automatically), so this isn’t really a function of the font family.
If your display is many hundreds of pixels wide and has and several shades for antialiasing, any good font designed and hinted for screens would work.
Thank you so much for your work.
If anybody wants a good example of how not-good looking Inter is for headlines/articles check out: https://thehill.com/
I think part of the popularity is that it is free, and it is a decent enough grotesk font to do the job, but you wont get great results with it.
Is there a estimated release date of the Inter Display font?
I think Inter is getting more popular (since it's free) and replacing other popular ones like Circular that cost an arm and a leg, and pretty "look the same" in the lay-person's eyes.
There's a whole slew of similar, free typefaces now: Public Sans (https://public-sans.digital.gov/), Work Sans (https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Work+Sans), Metropolis (https://fontsarena.com/metropolis-by-chris-simpson/)
I greatly prefer the simplified glyphs for programming. Like IBM's Plex.
Adobe's Source Code Pro uses curly glyphs for the normal typeface and simplified for italics, which seems backwards to me.
https://fonts.adobe.com/fonts/source-code-pro
I can't quickly refind the customizable font project with source code, where you recompile the typeface with the options you want.
Ubuntu is an OpenType-based font family, designed to be a modern, humanist-style typeface[1] by London-based type foundry Dalton Maag, with funding by Canonical Ltd https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_(typeface)
EDIT: And now I learn that the designer is Swedish, so if anyone needs me I’ll be eating my helping of crow for that last remark. :$ Sorry Rasmus!
I swear modern graphics designers only test their designs on high-DPI mac laptops and smartphones.
Honestly, it looks like shit due to the Latin small letter i and j being wrongly positioned, and the kerning in general is faulty (e.g. see the Latin small letter p in the words "shape" or "glyphs", or the Latin small letter e in "zero"). This is on a correctly working Linux system, no other fonts exhibit these problems.
One thing I don't love about Inter is how wide it is. It takes up a ton of space on mobile. While it is a variable font, it does not support variable width. This is addressed with Inter Display, but I believe that is still alpha and not recommended for use.
One thing I did notice it's the characters are bolder in Firefox than Chrome, don't know if it can be fixed at font level or it's a browser thing. But it's not a big deal.
If you folks have not used, I highly recommend it to try it out!
3 years ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18784583
Not an unknown entity really in the design world or general web dev circles, as it's been included in google fonts etc
Anyway, as long as it is not automatically replaced every time someone types ¿¡, it's all good.
The other contextual changes look good.
The San Francisco font was first released Nov 2014 [0]
Inter was first release in Aug 2017 [1]
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco_(sans-serif_type...
[1] https://fontsinuse.com/typefaces/93554/inter-rasmus-andersso...
They're both literally just Helvetica modernized a bit to remove personality (like the curled end to an "R" or "a", or the downstroke of the "G"), and with spacing appropriate for screens rather than print.
Inter isn't any more derivative than San Francisco is -- they're both derivative.
If you'd consider using this, why not just use San Francisco itself? I believe Apple supplies it for download so you can use it on any platform.
Alternatively, if you're looking for something generic and familiar that isn't Apple's default, wouldn't it be better to use whatever the default font is on a given platform? Or better yet: choose a typeface that suits your brand and use it across all platforms?
It's been a while since I had to make these kinds of decisions as a designer. Of course it could be that I haven't been thinking about this deeply enough, but these kinds of "budget" fonts don't resonate with me, particularly when the alternative is free.*
* A good counterexample would be the surge in popularity of Gotham after Obama's first presidential run. Proxima Nova was a reasonable and widely available substitute for the fairly expensive Gotham.
Why not use a different font? Is it harmful in any way to use alternative fonts? What is the benefit of using San Francisco?
You can't easily use it or even extract it on other platforms. Also:
> Subject to the terms of this License, you may use the Apple Font solely for creating mock-ups of user interfaces to be used in software products running on Apple’s iOS, iPadOS, macOS or tvOS operating systems, as applicable. The foregoing right includes the right to show the Apple Font in screen shots, images, mock-ups or other depictions, digital and/or print, of such software products running solely on iOS, iPadOS, macOS or tvOS. Your use of the Apple Font shall also be subject to any specific use restrictions with respect thereto as set forth in the Apple Font or Apple’s Human Interface Guidelines. You may use this Apple Font only for the purposes described in this License and only if you are a registered Apple Developer, or as otherwise expressly permitted by Apple in writing.