The Future of PrivacyTools
blog.privacytools.io
blog.privacytools.io
A name change is a huge thing and you're diluting your userbase. I also think most of your userbase will consider such name changes a bad thing as rebranding is a major marketing tool of big business which a lot of us would be sceptical of.
I think you do good work but your name is already perfect.
For context, we did bring this up with Burung Hantu, when he was around about 6 months ago. We offered to buy the domain.
The exact details were discussed more here:
See here: https://privacytools.io/classic/
[0] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/single-file/?
Freddy, do you mind reaching out to me at radim@pii-tools.com? I'd like to discuss options of support / partnership, for the (formerly) PrivacyTools.
You guys are taking leave-me-alone privacy really seriously!
Domain Name: FREDDYM.XYZ
Registry Domain ID: D188258119-CNIC
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.tucows.com
Registrar URL: http://www.tucows.com/
Updated Date: 2021-07-13T05:55:57.0Z
Creation Date: 2020-06-02T10:18:31.0Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2021-06-02T23:59:59.0Z
Registrar: Tucows.com Co.I’ve been visiting for years, it’s a good site
Edit: looks like it’s becoming a business?
> The PrivacyTools team is proud to introduce a suite of privacy-centric online services to connect you with other privacy-minded individuals and stay safe and secure online. No advertisers, no Google Analytics, no tracking, no third-party requests of any kind
> Eventually, we plan on creating a new legal organization designed around the community to ensure our long-term sustainability. This will take some careful planning and time to get right, but we’re confident we can prevent this from ever happening again, and keep us independent of any one team member.
Just to clarify, we plan to become a 501(c)(3) organization.
The site will remain run in the same way, it's just we won't have someone at the very top who is never around, never contributes and owns the domain.
Funding is transparently listed:
https://opencollective.com/privacytools
https://blog.privacytools.io/privacytools-io-joins-the-open-...
See what happened to freenode recently, how well that worked out for them :)
That is the intention, and it says that in the blog article :).
> Eventually, we plan on creating a new legal organization designed around the community to ensure our long-term sustainability. This will take some careful planning and time to get right, but we’re confident we can prevent this from ever happening again, and keep us independent of any one team member.
Just to clarify, we plan to become a 501(c)(3) organization.
This was another thing Burung Hantu wasn't interested in.
https://github.com/privacytools/privacytools.io/pull/1619
After that experience I determined that privacytools is a club for cool kids.
"tell more about VyOS and how it is a privacy tool and secure and how we won't regret listing it [...] remember citations so your research can be confirmed"
Is it possible that the privacytools folks are not willfully excluding your suggestion, but merely waiting until they understand it? I know what VyOS is, but I don't imagine most people do.
The founder is Jonah Aragon right? He used to run an OpenNIC TLD if I'm correct and abandoned that for some reason a long time ago.
No, he's the system administrator, the founder was Burung Hantu. https://privacytools.io/about/
If you run a serious web project, ownership of domain names is critical asset management, especially if you care for privacy. If the current domain was to get hijacked by someone's commercial ambitions, the site would probably be reworked towards the kind of BS VPN blabbering you described.
I don't agree with all of PrivacyTools' angles and priorities, making a lot of their advice pretty impractical for most people. But the purist approach is also interesting to follow, even if one doesn't jump on the bandwagon.
VPNs used to play a large role in the site (they no longer do), but we've never accepted any affiliate requests. (We do however operate a sponsorship programe which we are working on making a criteria for). [2,3] We have a strict criteria for the few VPNs we do list on our site. [4] We strive to educate users on the purpose of VPNs [5], and try not to recommend when there are other options.
[1] https://blog.privacytools.io/the-trouble-with-vpn-and-privac... [2]https://www.privacytools.io/sponsors/ [3]https://github.com/privacytools/privacytools.io/issues/2134 [4] https://privacytools.io/providers/vpn/#criteria [5] https://blog.privacytools.io/understanding-vpns/
I hope the process around software-suggestions gets clearer with this move; the backlog has been growing steadily for over a year [0] with developers left hanging without any follow-up (for ex, a suggestion I submitted hasn't been looked at in over 6 months).
[0] https://github.com/privacytools/privacytools.io/labels/%F0%9...
Their privacy recommendations are good. It’s my go-to place, and I have been a frequent user.