Myopia: A Modern yet Reversible Disease
gettingstronger.org
gettingstronger.org
The results appear to have been replicated in another experiment: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16907670/
> "The regression analysis showed that myopia progression significantly decreased with increasing amount of undercorrection (r (2) = 0.02, P = 0.02) in all children"
Just because you have sources doesn't mean its true. Look at how healthy diets have changed in the past years based on scientific studies. If you wanted to be healthy according to 2005 science then by all means eat your low-fat high-carb diet.
My prescription is really slight (I think like -.5 or -.75) and I was really curious if this was reversible at all, but I'm skeptical of claims that it is.
You are not alone[1].
> Does anyone have actual experience reversing myopia?
Not me but I have heard from multiple independent contacts telling me that they reversed slight myopia through yoga at different period of time. And every time I hear that I try to search for scientific evidence and come back empty handed.
[1] https://needgap.com/problems/251-eye-strain-due-to-lockdown-... (Disclaimer: My platform)
Since I'm 25, whenever I do an eye test, they tell me that I have a very small amount of myopia on one eye but it's very small and I don't need glasses.
Interestingly, when I talked to an eye doctor recently, he told me that they no longer try to push glasses so much when there's a small vision issue.
It's something that has felt wrong to me, and worried me a lot (you know, since I use my eyes for a lot of things that are important to me). I will definitely look further into this and try the techniques discussed here.
Myopia progresses in two stages: (1) near work induces lens spasm, causing pseudo-myopia; (2) use of minus lenses temporarily improves distance vision, but leads to eye elongation and axial myopia. The result of elongation is a need to prescribe stronger minus lenses, in a vicious cycle of ever stronger lenses.
I haven't watched the video yet, but this sounds like my experience.
From a brief search it seems that studies show that glasses don't make eyesight worse.
Ortho-K is fairly expensive ($1-3K from memory), and fairly rare. I could only find a couple places that do it in my entire state.
Be sure to get checks regularly and practice extra good eye hygiene, because they do have a higher risk of infections, also eye doctors do not recommend them.
Biggest drawback I experience are coronas around bright lights at night, but you do get used to them. I can conformably drive a car at night, because the sight is sharp. The extend also varies from person to person.
If you can tolerate the lenses with your eyes open, you can also already wear them in the evening if you need perfect sight in low light.
On topic: you cannot permanently reverse myopia, but it gets better when you get older for some people.
Ortho-K lenses can however be used by children to stop myopia from getting worse.
I'm also very skeptical when doctors say you have to constantly wear glasses. It's more logical that with glasses our eyes are becoming even more lazy.
All this myopia pandemic looks like a natural consequence of our modern lifestyle – looking at screens most of the time. So it's more like an adaptation. But I don't think it's possible to reverse it without throwing away all the screens.
The dangerous thing about this talk is that the first 2/3rds are true. Reading, looking at screens and working up close as a child and young adult do cause progressively worse myopia by way of progressive elongation. This isn't controversial at all. There's no evidence that spectacle use influences progression.
The latter 3rd is all bullshit. While our eyes continue to grow and elongate until around our mid 20's, there's no mechanism I'm aware of that can shorten the eye which is what you would have to do to "reverse" myopia. This is more or less common sense.
There are studies that show that low doses of atropine given to children who are myopic with reduce the progression, but not reverse pathological myopia. At this point we're just waiting on FDA approval of a low-concentration atropine drop. I suspect that in the near future the prevalence of high and pathological myopia is going to decrease dramatically.
For example in my case I have medium myopia (< -3). The prospect of not wearing glasses anymore is very appealing to me and I don't really care about the length of the eye if all the symptoms disappear with this "blur adaptation. What am I missing?
We also have reading glasses that are about 2 diopters weaker than our distance (driving) glasses.
Anecdotal of course. I don't know anyone else who's claimed that reading a backlit computer screen is better than reading a printed book.
I don't know how (non-backlit) e-paper compares.
I've been wearing glasses for 18 years. My prescription peaked around -3.75. Last year I got the usual eye strain suggesting my prescription needed changing, so I went to an optician and they suggested a stronger prescription: -0.5 more in each eye, and quite a strong change in astigmatism. I was a bit skeptical as usually when my prescription changed before it was -0.25 in one eye or the other, and I could still read mostly ok, just after a long day my eyes were tired. They insisted it was correct, so I ordered the glasses but when I got them I couldn't read a computer screen for more than 15 minutes without lots of eye strain. I went back to them, they tested my eyes again and said everything was fine and I just need to get used to it... Right.
After that I went to an eye hospital where they do laser surgery as they do much more extensive testing. They said my eyes were perfectly healthy, but the issue was the that the prescription opticians gave me was for distance use, not for computer use. I was a bit flabbergasted at first - you are telling me for the last 18 years opticians have been giving me the wrong prescription?!?! They suggested -3.25 for computer use, and to keep my old -3.75 glasses for driving. Sure enough, I can see computer screens perfectly fine with these glasses and no eye strain.
The change in astigmatism they noted is likely related to changes in your natural lens caused by the same process.
I recall reading that one of the causes for myopia, from an environmental and habit perspective, is reading in low light. Having sufficient lighting available reduces the strain on the eyes and could prevent or reduce the development of myopia. You could perhaps look at increasing the lighting when you read printed papers or reading them in a natural sunlit environment with hardly any shadows.
-A 1969 study of Eskimos found that myopia had increased dramatically since Western schooling was introduced
-A 2012 study of German students found more than 50% of university graduates had myopia vs. 25% for dropouts
-In countries like Singapore and Taiwan, myopia is common among even young school children
They all fit in the "correlation does not imply causation".
I have dropped 1.75 in one year. And this is without being super intense
Edit: eventually found this: https://losetheglasses.org/cliffgnu-vision.pdf
Now granted I spent most of my time growing up playing on the computer and reading - but I was wearing my glasses the whole time so year by year it got worse. Eye doctors say “oh youre just growing into your eyes” when they know that’s not the case. Look at how many children have (pseudo)-myopia due to growing up with smartphones and tablets 24/7. It’s not hard to figure out.
Now I don’t think there’s an exact science to curing myopia but at the very least everyone should practice the 20/20/20 rule and wear their distance glasses as little as possible. Just those 2 things can save you from developing pseudomyopia.
AFAIU it's relatively well established that regular sunlight exposure is critical to proper eye development. But judging by the numbers you mentioned this revelation (at least the scientific evidence for it) would have post-dated your childhood years.
In fact, in a famous case they had to abort the study early due to ethical grounds. The vision for the (uncorrected) control group was degenerating so much faster that they felt compelled to give everyone the correct prescription.