It is already pretty useless, because militia is not going to have tanks, bombers, fighter jets and nukes anyway.
It was an alright idea when it was introduced, but is mostly obsolete today.
It was an alright idea when it was introduced, but is mostly obsolete today.
One, guerrilla warfare works. Two, the point is to increase the cost of suppression to requiring U.S. tanks and bombers and jets deployed against the homeland. An unarmed population can be more casually suppressed.
Can you see how people in favor of gun rights might not find your second argument convincing, in light of the first?
I also never claimed no one is "coming to take your guns," although I do believe that is mostly just right-wing propaganda, and was referring to the propaganda value of that threat as being the only useful vestige of the revolutionary principle of the Second Amendment remaining, because the actual disparity in firepower between the populace and the US military renders the practical utility of it irrelevant.