Actual title: "Court orders US Capitol rioter to unlock his laptop ‘with his face’"
Biometrics do not enjoy Fifth Amendment protections, as has been established and demonstrated in multiple past cases at the federal level.
From article: “Courts across the U.S. are still divided on the reading of the Fifth Amendment and whether it applies to the compelled use of a person’s biometrics. The U.S. Supreme Court isn’t likely to address the issue any time soon, rejecting two petitions in as many years to rule on the matter, leaving it largely up to the states to decide.”
I guess violations of the Constitution don't matter if the victim is someone you disagree with. When they come for you, who will be left to speak up for you?
Has anyone sabotaged their biometric sensors? I used a toe print on one phone's fingerprint reader. The next time I used the impression of a vegetable. Had not previously thought about loading the facial recognition with bogus images, but I am now.
Just turn off facial imaging for unlocking?
Best argument against using biometrics I've seen (out of the many good arguments against using biometrics).