You continue to insist the world has agreed in unison with the interpretation you personally like, but that's not the case.
Do you realize many worlds doesn't require collapse?
Frankly, I don’t understand anything you‘re trying to say in your multiple replies to my comments, and I suggest you spare yourself any further effort in this direction.
And technically if they were, this would be apparent in many more ways than entanglement experiments, and it WOULD violate causality.
General relativity also has no such concept as "simultaneous events" at distance. The very point of the theory is that event simultaneity is a meaningless concept at distance (any distance, but especially at large distance).
So from scale cosmic to scale quantum, "non-local" is a meaningless concept, yet we have to just assume none of this matters and call the wave function collapse non-local, because that's the only way we decided the experiments make sense.
So you're trying to handwave an issue away that's bigger than you admit. It implies space beyond space and time beyond time, where everything in the universe can happen simultaneously for two entangled particles regardless of where and when in that universe they happen to be.
It's such an outrageous concept to introduce in this special case, with zero explanation, and without considering the larger implications it has, it honestly borders on The Avengers techno-babble about time travel in terms of how much sense it makes.