If there was such a tool, and it was accurate, do you think insurance companies would have insured the parts of Germany that recently flooded?
I think you may be underestimating the complexity of both weather and climate modelling.
I think you may be underestimating the complexity of both weather and climate modelling.
In my area thats 4490887(m^2) ×0,2(m^3 water) = 898 177.4 ^ m3 max rain water. Now all i want is a model of what areas would be reached on a stream if it received this much water.
I know that some here are grumpy because there houses may loose value like a sinking ship very soon. But knowing is better then not knowing. Always.
No fluid-simulations needed, just a basic Topographic map fill the pond.
If you dumped that amount of rain water in one second, you'd have a Tsunami. Dump it over a 24 hour period, it might flow out smoothly out of a little stream. Dump it 10% in an hour, 50% in the next hour, 10% the next hour, 30% over the next 12? Um, that's harder.
Many insurance companies will be happy to write you a policy for something high risk but they will absolutely charge you more to compensate. It's all a numbers and probability game for them.