I don't see how chess is any different.
I don't see how chess is any different.
Blacklist and whitelist are used as linguistic symbols: black==bad white==good.
That is pretty different to me.
I'm open to being wrong but to be this connection of archetypal meanings and skin color is a stretch. I don't look at a white phone or black phone and think good or bad (in fact I have a black phone and prefer dark colors while my skin tone is the opposite). One which requires a lot of fundamental change in language and how we think. Because I'm sure I'm not the only one that has codified this representation in my mind. And most of us should understand archetypes are not how you go about judging the world or people. I don't see a person dressed in red and think "angry" (which would be a different emotion in a different culture), or yellow and "happy". I just see colors.
That is pretty different to me.
Perhaps this would be solved if we used different words to describe skin tone than we did light. If “white skin” was called “wumbo skin” and “black skin” called “mumbo skin” it would be more clear the etymology of which terms were referring to day vs night rather than skin tone.
https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.psichi.org/resource/resmgr/journal...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black-and-white_dualism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_and_white_hat_symbolism_...