There's another strategy that works better than searching for a keyword, which is to read the article.

It's about the difficulty/expense of systematically and scientifically studying the software development process (e.g. finding out what data actually exists to support the claim that "a bug is cheaper to squash when it is caught during the specification process").

The title expresses frustration not at science itself, but at how needlessly difficult this process is, since both the secondary and primary academic literature surrounding it are of extremely low quality.