Even if there is a large skew, the mean and median will be often still be pretty close together. Especially with a large sample size.
I feel like people have this default reaction to assert that median is as or more important than mean. When, in reality, median is useful for in only specific distributions.
I think people say "median", but what they are really interested are the moments of the distribution. Median just is a key moment in Guassian distributions, other distributions have different important moments, and median isn't necessarily one of them.
Given assumptions about the distribution, you may even be able to fit (or at least narrow down) the exact shape based on these two values.